Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Review: The Summer Escape

The Summer Escape The Summer Escape by Jill Shalvis
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

2.5 stars 

I received this book for free, this does not affect my opinion of the book or the content of my review 

He gave her a small smile. “Keep your friends close...” 
“And your enemies closer.” 

After finding an old gold coin in a box of her father's things, Anna now finds herself on a mission to prove that he didn't steal it, along with a Ruby Red necklace. Owen's been wanting to find his great-aunt's heirloom necklace for her for years and when he sees a news story about a gold coin that could be the first clue in years, he's not going to leave Anna's side. As a private investigator, Anna feels she has it covered but Owen's worried she'll lie to protect her father's reputation, so they find themselves working together and deluding themselves that “Once to get it out of our system!” is the solution for the building chemistry they find between themselves. 

Owen honestly hadn't known he was into sharp, cynical, feisty firecrackers with a side of sweet, but apparently there was a first time for everything. 

The Summer Escape is in the Sunrise Cove series but borrows from the setting, rather than continued character story lines, you could just pick this up. Anna's our late twenties character, who has the more interesting job of private investigator, but other than a grab your attention beginning dealing with the consequences of such a job, I'm not sure it was fully utilized to it's potential. Her father died a year ago and she's still dealing with the grief when she finds the gold coin. With her older sister Wendy pushing her, she takes it to a pawn shop to get appraised, which kicks off the whole chain of events. Wendy plays a decent sized role in this, she's eight months pregnant with triplets and because she's on bed-rest, feels the need to “come along” with Anna on her investigation (Go-Pro and Air Pods). We also get povs from Wendy, which fine, but your enjoyment of this story is going to come down to if you get annoyed with Wendy being “there” in a good portion of Anna and Owen scenes. I fell more on the annoyed side, especially when Anna and Owen were getting to know one another and some chemistry was trying to build, only to be “humorously” interrupted by Wendy. Your mileage may vary. 

“We said this wasn't happening. We're wrong for each other.” She didn't like the desperation in her voice. 

If you're a frequent Shalvis reader, you'll get some of that easy flowing sweet and flirty chemistry that she's known for, but a little less of the fun and light. This had Anna dealing with her grief, and fear that her dad was a thief, tarnishing his halo a bit to her and Owen having some of his own grief with his great-aunt suffering and declining from dementia. These two ruminated in these emotional upheavals, along with Anna not thinking she was good enough for Owen and Owen, faintly, because he seems just about all in pretty quickly, shaking off his playboy demeanor/past. I missed more of the fun falling in love, with some emotional hurdles, that I love Shalvis for, because this was more of rinse and repeat Anna saying a relationship between them would never work. If you like your characters to therapist chair talk to each other (this could be me being a tad dramatic) instead of flirt on, like, a kitchen counter, this would be more for you. 

She met his gave. “We can't get too attached, right?” 
And wasn't that the problem, because he was beginning to realize he was already very attached, and...he wanted more, far more. 

The investigation to find out who stole the coins and necklace, was fairly weak, I kept waiting for our private investigator Anna to do a lot more. She has a police officer friend give her the name of suspects from the original theft case, and there is some going to talk to a few people, but overall, didn't feel super active (which, I guess, real but not real entertaining) A danger blast from the past arrives later in the story to give us some action in the end and answers to the coins and necklace questions. The danger gives Anna a chance to open her eyes and realize what she really wants from life to give us the HEA. 

He was pretty sure her smile made his heart skip a beat. 

If a very pregnant sister cutting in and more emotional rumination than fun flirting, with a little side investigation that delivers some danger sounds good to you, then Shalvis always has that smooth flowing writing that is easy to pick up.

12 comments:

  1. As always, I liked reading your review (even though I don't comment often). I've tried a book by this author many years ago and it wasn't a great experience... looking at the grade you gave this one, it seems I might not be missing much...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She's an author that I binged back in the day, which caused me to get tired of her formula (she does seem to be trying new things in her newer pubs lately).
      I really like her for easy, sweet, sexy, contemporary romance but she definitely has a formula, so if one doesn't work, the rest probably won't.
      The first books in her Lucky Harbor series were my favorite and some of the Animal Magnetism, if you ever want to try her again.

      I'm so behind in reading blogs/reviews, I still need to check what everyone read for the TBRChallenge. I'm the same way with commenting, I feel like there's this little group of us out there that are still reading blogs but are just more quiet.

      Delete
    2. Hi!
      I think the one I read was precisely part of the Lucky Harbor series...

      Sometimes I check reviews, mostly the ones in blogs I follow already and I peek at the TBR entries of those who signed up for the challenge. However, to be honest, I don't always know what to say or have something to say... :(

      Delete
    3. Whelp, disregard that Lucky Harbor rec, lol.

      That's ok, I'm the same way, I'm not always commenting either. If they have a Wordpress blog, you can sometimes "Like" the post, or "Follow" the blog, if you want to "show" you're hanging around. But those aren't necessary options either.
      Are you on GoodReads? I always get more interaction over there, if that is what you are looking for.

      Delete
    4. I have a GR account yes, but I don't write about all my reads there as I do on the blog. But thank you, I'll look you up!

      Delete
  2. It's been years since I read Shalvis, and this doesn't sound like the one that's call me back--especially not with the "your pregnant sister is listening in" bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's such a big "ymmv" additive. I guess it was to add some comedy, since everything has to be rom-com now.
      Ol' humorless Whiskey was not a fan.

      Delete
    2. Seriously, why are all contemporaries now required to be campy comedy humor? I absolutely get people using snarky funny commentary to cope with life--mostly because I often do--but these days it feels like there's nothing but campy camp contemporaries, or else they're an entirely different subgenre, and either the romance thread is not front and center, or the gimmick-du-jour is so obnoxious it displaces the relationship in my subconsious.

      Either way: aztec no like.

      Delete
    3. Campy/hokey humor is the kind that is the hardest for me to connect with, some of Jennifer Crusie is about the only to get me with that.

      The Summertime Punchline review I just wrote up had me wondering if I should even mention it, again, that the romance felt pushed behind in favor of the female main character's journey. It really does feel like what we old-head romance readers considered contemporary romance is just now rom-com/chik-lit/women's fiction romance.
      I'm tiring myself out mentioning, fighting, pointing it out. Evolving in a direction, I guess.

      Someone sent me screen shots of discussions on Threads and I don't think people use sub-genres a lot anymore? I don't know, a younger person said Erotica made her think of her grandma's bodice rippers, so she doesn't like to use the term. But I'm like, it's just the sub-genre??

      Put me down for no like, too

      Delete
    4. Good lord in heaven. Erotice = "grandma's bodice rippers"?

      Part of me wants to say, "sweet summer child", because that much ignorance... But a bigger part wants to snarl, because that's some epic flattening of the genre that blasts any hope of nuance out the water for good.

      Then again, there are millions of genre romance readers who don't realize they've been reading genre romance for years/decades; people who've never been much online and never connected with any of the twigs of the romancelandia tree, for example, have probably read several of the genre romances that "transcend the genre" ::cough bullshit cough:: or whichever book or series the algorithm recommended after they watched oh, 50 Shades ("it's everywhere, darling, I had to know what the hype was all about, don't you know") or Outlander or Bridgerton or Virgin River or whatever.

      And they enjoy their <> genre fiction with little thought and no discussion; who are we to say they don't have it better than us? (they don't)

      As for the heroine's journey over genre romance trend, yeah, it's very noticeable; several people I know who consistently read straight* contemporaries for years have noticed how many of their fave authors have moved on to a more "women's fiction"/chick lit oriented writing; one wonders how much of that is a search for legitimacy (and presumably better contracts/higher royalties than in genre romance publishing), or the writers' own personal growth (as a person and author).

      *straight in the sense of not-a-subgenre: no mystery, paranormal shenanigans, etc.; just a love story where the external conflict is not the focus, the relationship is.

      Mind you, as far back as the mid-aughts, there were romance bloggers talking about "the death of the contemporary", so it is not a new phenomenon.

      /rant

      gah, I feel really old now.

      Delete
  3. epic flattening of the genre that blasts any hope of nuance out the water for good.

    This right here is my problem, nuance is needed! Normally, I'm more whatever to younger voice opinions, I'm sure I've said my share of dumb shit but it's this collective thinking gaining track that is getting my hackles up.

    I was just at a book club on Saturday where no one is romancelandia online, I consider myself only about 40% in online romancelandia and it is always jarring to hear from the two. Most are bewildered that historical romance doesn't exist in places like Target anymore and I have to be like, well, the readers on TikTok don't like it, even though I would guess the vast majority of romance readers don't exist solely online.

    I got the dreaded your first warning about reviews on Amazon and at first I was going to read through them and edit (abandoned this pretty quickly because 15yrs worth, no thanks, so I just deleted pretty much everything before 2023. It's wild to see what Amazon used to allow in reviews compared to now) and I caught a few reviews from 2014/5 of me complaining about the women's fiction feel. So yeah, that's why I'm tiring myself out on still mentioning this, I guess time to accept that's wear contemp is/heading.

    Seeing that erotica grandma talk made me realize it's time to fully accept my crone lol.

    ReplyDelete